“You might be right. But so many people in the city and everywhere like that man. In my neighborhood especially, and which I can never quite get used to. Even someone who walks a three-legged dog. The dog does well — compensates — but he has three. But there’s a one-legged baby in a baby carriage and always on Broadway that destroys me every time I see her.”
“A three-legged dog, sad; a one-legged baby — that’s tragedy.”
“Sometimes when I’m feeling very sad about people and animals like that — which can last for minutes to hours after — I think, and usually soon after I felt that way, that I only felt this for myself somehow — but it’s not true or not most times.”
“Of course it isn’t. Probably never, or only rarely. Your response is authentically sympathetic rather than self-pitying.”
“And I’m not saying this to have anyone think better of me. But why can’t we feel these things for these people — forget the three-legged animals; what can I do for them? — and help them when we can? Not just what we did before, but sort of.”
“Now you’ve lost me.”
“If they need assistance across the street. Reaching for things for them in supermarkets they can’t reach. And I guess for dogs if they’re lost or starved no matter how many legs — feeding them or helping them find their way home.”
“No, those are good things to do. And if you mean
“There, we discussed something interesting and stayed with it for once. We needed the robbery of an old crippled man to catalyze the discussion, and let’s face it, nothing that profound was said and maybe only a baby-step past knickknacks. But we could always bullshit well.”
“That wasn’t bullshit.”
“I know; just trying out something new for no reason: depreciating what I said if it made the littlest bit of sense.”
“That was real talk, real feelings. Maybe not the deepest, but this is only a car conversation to get us safely home. But I’ll tell you, a lot of what some people say sounds false to them isn’t. So it doesn’t mean you should hold your sentiments in check because of what they don’t feel. And we could do plenty else — plenty — besides bull and serious talk.”
“What besides what I think you’re thinking we used to be able to do well, which, all right, we did, but so what?”
“Oh that? We could still do it well — believe me — no sweat.”
“Let’s change the subject?”
“Or with lots of sweat. But let’s change it. Getting too grownup for me. Wait, that’s not the remark I wanted to make.”
“We used to cook compatibly together.”
“You’re referring to what else we used to do well together besides bullshit and serious talk and that other subject before we changed it?”
“Yup, cook. We complemented each other in the kitchen.”
“We did, and we were also great summer tourists in Europe together, with lots of European sweat. Real sweat, from the sun and lots of jaunting, not that changed subject. And when I had a motorcycle you were a great passenger behind me and then rider when I taught you how to ride it and I was the passenger, so we rode well together in various ways too. And what else well? Well, not do but attend and-or enjoy: opera, dance, occasionally the same book. And we once painted your living room together.”
“Not compatibly.”
“I bellyached, true. So we didn’t do that so well together, nor your foyer. Like to stop for a bite together? Empire Cafe on your right.”
“No, just want to go home and go to bed.”
“Mind if I ask how your work’s going, just to keep us compatibly on the road together?”
“Enough already with together. And fine. Curating fine?” We’ve stopped for a light. He didn’t answer. I look over at him. He’s looking pretty seriously at me. “Yipes, what’s coming next?”
“What do you expect? You’re so fucking great looking.”
“Now now.”
“Now now nothing. Fucking exciting great. I have got to kiss you. This is a long light. I know it from other nights. This one and another on Riverside and Eighty-third. I have got to, Helene.”
“Not to distract you, but did you put aftershave on in the men’s room?”
“Okay, why?”
“Just curious. You carry it in or was some left there?”