Читаем Soldaten полностью

Naturally, the question arises of whether the POWs might have known they were being listened in on. That would cast doubt upon the authenticity of the information they provide. They must have at least suspected that the British and Americans would want to tap into what they knew, and they could have consciously spread disinformation. In fact, Allied methods of intelligence gathering were hardly unknown in Germany. A POW named Franz von Werra, who had been briefly interned at Trent Park, managed to escape British custody and reported back in detail about English interrogation techniques.906 On June 11, 1941, the German Military Intelligence Service issued guidelines about how Wehrmacht soldiers were to behave if captured by the British. They included warnings about potential spies in German uniform and concealed microphones. The authors of the guidelines explicitly stressed that the enemy had repeatedly obtained valuable information via such channels.907 In November 1943, as part of the first exchange of POWs, Lieutenant Commander Schilling returned to Germany and briefed his superiors about his and others’ experiences with British interrogation. In this way, the Wehrmacht supreme command learned the names of a number of spies who were working with the British. They also heard that the generals in Trent Park “were too open and cavalier in their mutual conversations, neglecting the need for caution.” Again, it was stressed that German soldiers should beware of spies and covert surveillance should they happen to be captured.908

The protocols, however, strongly suggest that most German POWs forgot all about these warnings and prattled on heedlessly with their comrades about their military experiences. For instance, there are repeated references in conversations between NCOs and ordinary soldiers to the Nazi propaganda film Warriors Behind Barbed Wire909 as well as cautionary remarks not to reveal information to the enemy. But in the same breath, the speakers would then discuss matters they had concealed during interrogations,910 dictating secrets directly into a waiting microphone. It never occurred to most soldiers that they could be under covert surveillance—a fact confirmed by the self-incriminating statements they made concerning atrocities.911 No doubt, some soldiers kept their mouths shut, perhaps because they suspected their quarters might be bugged.912 But most just threw caution to the wind after a short time. The need to share their thoughts with comrades was greater than the dictates of prudence.913

We must recall that the Allies used a number of clever tricks to tap the knowledge of their enemy. German exiles and cooperative POWs were used to steer conversations,914 and POWs of the same rank but different divisions and units were housed together. These methods proved very successful. Submarine navigators from various vessels swapped stories about what they had experienced, and Luftwaffe officers recalled battles and compared notes about the technical details of their aircraft. Soldiers were often transferred to the camps only a few days after they had been captured, and many were still in a state of shock from the often dramatic circumstances in which they had been taken prisoner. That increased their need to talk. After all, many had narrowly escaped being killed. There was no difference in the behavior of officers and ordinary soldiers on this score.

The interrogation reports from Fort Hunt demonstrate just how cooperative many POWs were. A surprising number of them simply told everything they knew in hope of getting better treatment or—far more rarely—to damage the Nazi regime.915 Some dictated data like exact measurements to the interrogating officers; others made sketches of military facilities in Germany or construction plans for weaponry. Most of the POWs hesitated to cooperate to that extent, but only censored themselves with reference to tactical and technical specifics. On questions of politics, conditions in Germany, or morale in the Wehrmacht, they were entirely forthcoming. These men were equally open when conversing with one another. To the delight of Allied intelligence officers, the only taboo was talking about one’s own feelings.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

1945. Блицкриг Красной Армии
1945. Блицкриг Красной Армии

К началу 1945 года, несмотря на все поражения на Восточном фронте, ни руководство III Рейха, ни командование Вермахта не считали войну проигранной — немецкая армия и войска СС готовы были сражаться за Фатерланд bis zum letzten Blutstropfen (до последней капли крови) и, сократив фронт и закрепившись на удобных оборонительных рубежах, всерьез рассчитывали перевести войну в позиционную фазу — по примеру Первой мировой. Однако Красная Армия сорвала все эти планы. 12 января 1945 года советские войска перешли в решающее наступление, сокрушили вражескую оборону, разгромили группу армий «А» и всего за три недели продвинулись на запад на полтысячи километров, превзойдя по темпам наступления Вермахт образца 1941 года. Это был «блицкриг наоборот», расплата за катастрофу начального периода войны — с той разницей, что, в отличие от Вермахта, РККА наносила удар по полностью боеготовому и ожидающему нападения противнику. Висло-Одерская операция по праву считается образцом наступательных действий. Эта книга воздает должное одной из величайших, самых блистательных и «чистых» побед не только в отечественной, но и во всемирной истории.

Валентин Александрович Рунов , Ричард Михайлович Португальский

Военная документалистика и аналитика / Военная история / Образование и наука
1941. Забытые победы Красной Армии
1941. Забытые победы Красной Армии

1941-й навсегда врезался в народную память как самый черный год отечественной истории, год величайшей военной катастрофы, сокрушительных поражений и чудовищных потерь, поставивших страну на грань полного уничтожения. В массовом сознании осталась лишь одна победа 41-го – в битве под Москвой, где немцы, прежде якобы не знавшие неудач, впервые были остановлены и отброшены на запад. Однако будь эта победа первой и единственной – Красной Армии вряд ли удалось бы переломить ход войны.На самом деле летом и осенью 1941 года советские войска нанесли Вермахту ряд чувствительных ударов и серьезных поражений, которые теперь незаслуженно забыты, оставшись в тени грандиозной Московской битвы, но без которых не было бы ни победы под Москвой, ни Великой Победы.Контрнаступление под Ельней и успешная Елецкая операция, окружение немецкой группировки под Сольцами и налеты советской авиации на Берлин, эффективные удары по вражеским аэродромам и боевые действия на Дунае в первые недели войны – именно в этих незнаменитых сражениях, о которых подробно рассказано в данной книге, решалась судьба России, именно эти забытые победы предрешили исход кампании 1941 года, а в конечном счете – и всей войны.

Александр Подопригора , Александр Заблотский , Роман Ларинцев , Валерий Вохмянин , Андрей Платонов

Биографии и Мемуары / Военная документалистика и аналитика / Учебная и научная литература / Публицистическая литература / Документальное