Читаем The World полностью

The defeat led to the systematic destruction of Native American villages across the Great Plains; afterwards the tribes entered reservations. The Black Hills were seized; the pre-eminent beneficiary of the gold rush was a straggly-bearded Missouri-born mining engineer, now based in San Francisco, called George Hearst. A veteran of the ’49 gold rush, whose Homestake Mine helped make him the richest mining baron, Hearst afterwards won election as a senator and in 1880 accepted, as payment for a poker debt, a failing newspaper, the San Francisco Examiner, which he then presented to his son, William Randolph.

Hearst was just one of the robber barons who surfed the wave of muscular American capitalism. While black sharecroppers struggled to survive, cotton production recovered. Railways reached across the continent, doubling in length from 35,000 miles in 1865 to 70,000 by 1870. Railways became America’s business, enriching the titanic oligarchs of what the writer Mark Twain called the Gilded Age:* Vanderbilt switched into railway building, fighting rivals Jay Gould and E. H. Harriman. It was in his relations with businessmen that Grant, who had coolly overseen the army, now displayed a high-handed naivety that tainted his presidency.

The Gilded Age was coal-fuelled and steam-powered, but an angular and meticulous young man was investing in another carbon fuel that seemed useful only for illumination. In fact it would change the world. On 10 January 1870, the thirty-one-year-old John D. Rockefeller founded an oil refinery in Cleveland, Ohio, that he called Standard Oil. At the end of the civil war, he had started to buy out other oil refiners. Rockefeller’s ascetic nature, manifested in an obsession with order and tidiness, was a reaction against a father who was an itinerant huckster, bigamist and snake-oil salesman. Houses had long been lit by whale oil, extracted by whalers, but in 1857 oil was discovered seeping out of the ground in Oil Creek, Pennsylvania, starting a switch to Rockefeller’s chief product, kerosene, now used to light private houses and the streets of the growing cities. Rockefeller played what he called his ‘great game’, an aggressive integration of the oil business into one ‘trust’ that controlled everything from the gushing oil via ships and refineries to the customers who bought their kerosene tins from the local store. The by-products of refining oil were useful for making lubricants for machinery, skin products and something called gasoline, but it was not lucrative. There seemed no use for it.

Money was Grant’s weakness. The president was entertained by the omnivorous Gould, who, gobbling up railways, was also attempting to corner the gold market. Gould personified the glamour and sleaze of the predatorial capitalist: Americans, wrote Twain, had ‘desired money’ before, ‘but he taught them to fall down and worship it’. If Grant’s misjudgements spoiled his reputation, his real achievements were squandered by his successors.*

‘You say you’ve emancipated us. You have; and I thank you for it,’ said Douglass at the Republican convention in 1876, but ‘What does it all amount to, if the black man’s unable to exercise that freedom, and, after having been freed from the slaveholder’s lash, he is to be subject to the slaveholder’s shot-gun?’

In 1876, Grant steered the country through a viciously contested election that was ultimately won by an Ohio Republican, Rutherford Hayes, thanks to a deal that withdrew federal troops from the south and allowed southern Democrats to ‘redeem’ their states, passing a slew of repressive laws (known as Jim Crow after ‘Jump Jim Crow’, a white theatre act portraying black people) that enforced segregation of schools, entertainment and transport and prevented black people from voting, encouraging an atmosphere in which persecutions were normal, none more malignant than lynchings, which became ever more frequent. Some 6,500 black people (and 1,300 whites, usually immigrants) were lynched between 1865 and 1950. Hayes’s dark deal was scarcely redeemed by his appointment of the ageing Douglass as the first black US marshal in DC. The Union had won the war; the Confederacy won the peace.

On 5 January 1871, Bismarck finally got his way and Moltke’s Krupp guns started to bombard besieged Paris.

THE IRON CHANCELLOR AND DIZZY

After the fall of Napoleon, Paris was quickly surrounded. Bismarck and Wilhelm made themselves comfortable in the most luxurious residence in western Europe, the palace of James de Rothschild at Ferrières. ‘Here I sit,’ boasted Bismarck to his wife, ‘under a picture of old Rothschild and his family.’

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Вечный человек
Вечный человек

Особое место в творчестве А.Абсалямова занимает документальный военно-политический роман «Вечный человек». В нем повествуется о восстании узников фашизма в концлагере Бухенвальд, которое было подготовлено интернациональной организацией коммунистов. Главный герой романа — подполковник Баки Назимов, попавший в плен после тяжелого ранения в 1942 году. В романе воспроизведена напряженная политическая и психологическая атмосфера Бухенвальда, показаны лагерный быт, действия, организации сил Сопротивления, мужество, стойкость и верность коммунистическим убеждениям героев подпольщиков. Роман воспитывает в людях бдительность, веру в победу могучих сил мира и социализма над силами реакции и войны.

Евгений Михайлович Богат , Абдурахман Сафиевич Абсалямов , Гилберт Кийт Честертон , Гордон Диксон

Публицистика / Культурология / Философия / Проза / Советская классическая проза / Научная Фантастика / Военная проза
Повседневная жизнь французов во времена Религиозных войн
Повседневная жизнь французов во времена Религиозных войн

Книга Жана Мари Констана посвящена одному из самых драматических периодов в истории Франции — Религиозным войнам, длившимся почти сорок лет и унесшим тысячи человеческих жизней. Противостояние католиков и гугенотов в этой стране явилось частью общеевропейского процесса, начавшегося в XVI веке и известного под названием Реформации. Анализируя исторические документы, привлекая мемуарную литературу и архивные изыскания современных исследователей, автор показывает, что межконфессиональная рознь, проявления религиозного фанатизма одинаково отвратительны как со стороны господствующей, так и со стороны гонимой религии. Несомненный интерес представляет авторский анализ выборной системы, существовавшей во Франции в те далекие времена.

Жан Мари Констан

Культурология / История / Образование и наука